<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funding the Good Guys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jamesandthegiantcorn.com/2009/12/09/funding-the-good-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jamesandthegiantcorn.com/2009/12/09/funding-the-good-guys/</link>
	<description>Genetics: Studying the Source Code of Nature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesandthegiantcorn.com/2009/12/09/funding-the-good-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesandthegiantcorn.com/?p=1071#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>The reorganization will involve the expense of paying for a new layer of bureaucracy at CGIAR itself, so there definitely is a cost involved. The test will be if the increases donations and higher productivity of researchers will be enough to justify those costs. 

Since CGIAR&#039;s members voted for the change, hopefully they believed it would, on the balance, be a net positive financially, but we won&#039;t know for sure until the new system has been up an running for at least a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reorganization will involve the expense of paying for a new layer of bureaucracy at CGIAR itself, so there definitely is a cost involved. The test will be if the increases donations and higher productivity of researchers will be enough to justify those costs. </p>
<p>Since CGIAR&#8217;s members voted for the change, hopefully they believed it would, on the balance, be a net positive financially, but we won&#8217;t know for sure until the new system has been up an running for at least a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.jamesandthegiantcorn.com/2009/12/09/funding-the-good-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jamesandthegiantcorn.com/?p=1071#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>Nice post. Any idea if they&#039;re losing ground with this move? or is it just an efficiency reorganization?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Any idea if they&#8217;re losing ground with this move? or is it just an efficiency reorganization?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

