James and the Giant Corn Rotating Header Image

The (Exaggerated) Fall of Wheat

From a nytimes article on raising prices of wheat in response to the Russian ban on exports:

…wheat, the historic amber-waved grain of the American bread-basket, is out of fashion β€” a beleaguered has-been crop on many farms, supplanted by the modern cash-cow of farming: corn, used for everything from ethanol fuel to food additives to animal feed.

Fewer acres of wheat were planted nationally last year than any year since 1971, according to federal figures. Kansas, the biggest wheat-producing state, had fewer acres in cultivation this year than any since 1957.

I’ve talked about the troubles of wheat before. In short: it’s very difficult to produce hybrid wheat which keeps yield down, and farmers and companies worried about consumer fears of genetic engineering have kept genetically engineered wheat from being developed. Neither of those is a knock against wheat as a crop or a species, but the end result is there are more and more parts of the country where farmers can make more money planting corn than they could if they grew wheat.

I have some problems with the idea the nytimes seems to be pushing that corn has recently displaced wheat as the crop of choice for American farmers. America has been a nation of corn for a long time. These days corn has more of a PR problem than it used to, but it’s not some crop that came out of nowhere to. The factors I mentioned have tipped the scales slightly further against wheat, but wheat hasn’t been displaced as the first crop of America, simply because it never was to begin with.

With the exception of a couple of years, more farmland has been planted with corn than wheat consistently throughout the last century. And while the amount of corn an acre of land can produce is going up faster than the amount of wheat that can be grown on that same land, corn has consistently produced more food per acre over that entire timespan. Sound like a silly dispute? Absolutely. But it was an excuse to dig into the USDA’s historical data to generate this graph:

Notice that total production of wheat has not dropped along with the total amount of farmland devoted to producing wheat. Instead, increasing yield per acre has allowed farmers to continue to produce the same amount of wheat while planting less total land.

4 Comments

  1. Noah Fahlgren says:

    Whoa there, how dare you bring facts into this discussion! πŸ˜‰

    1. James says:

      Hey, it let me look productive while I was generating the graphs! πŸ˜€

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Aust FarmInstituteM, AgBlogFeed. AgBlogFeed said: The (Exaggerated) Fall of Wheat: From a nytimes article on raising prices of wheat in response to the Russi… http://bit.ly/ap9Bna #agchat […]

  3. Matt says:

    Well we’ll continue to be the country that befuddles Europeans for our love for eating pig food

Leave a Reply to James Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: